Full size polymer-bodied pistols of decent quality generally cost from $500 to $750 these days. If you dip below the $500 mark it may mean you’re getting something of significantly reduced quality and reliability. Turkish gun manufacturer Canik is challenging that notion with their TP9 SA pistol.
The $399 TP9 SA is an evolution of their TP9 double-action/single-action pistol. The SA model is single action only and comes in black and desert tan Duracoat. I spent time shooting the TP9 SA this month and found it to be quite the good value.
* * *
Why Consider the TP9?
While getting performance and quality on a budget is a goal for many first-time gun buyers, the reality is difficult or impossible to achieve. The TP9 SA seems to be the first legitimate answer to that quest in a full-size pistol.
In addition to the low price, the TP9 SA has several positive qualities that make it worthy of consideration, including interchangeable backstraps, eighteen rounds of 9mm in high-quality magazines, and perhaps the best trigger you’ll find on any striker-fired pistol at any price. I’m not kidding.
TP9 SA Specs:
- Chambering: 9mm
- Length: 7.5”
- Height: 5.7”
- Width: 1.35”
- Barrel: 4.09”
- Trigger: ~4.5 lb.
- Sights: White 3-dot with drift-adjustable rear
- Safety: n/a
- Weight: 24 oz.
- Slide: Black or Desert Tan Duracoat
- Capacity: 18+1
- MSRP: $399
Shooting the TP9
I quickly fell in love with the trigger. Shooting the TP9 SA is very enjoyable on that score. Despite the good trigger, the first thing I noticed is that this pistol shot really low for me. At 5 yards, it was shooting a full 1.5” low and the point of impact didn’t begin to become close to “normal” until after 15 yards. This anomaly could have been my mechanics, but I spoke with several others at the range who all claimed it shot low for them, too.
Mechanical offset issues aside, I was able to shoot the TP9 for small groups, so there’s nothing wrong with its accuracy. The pistol is comfortable in my hand and the trigger reach was quite short. For the purposes of this review I only put a few hundred rounds through the pistol, but it ran perfectly and it was an enjoyable experience. As per usual, my hands were all over the slide-lock lever so there were times the pistol did not lock open on the last round. All my fault.
The desert tan TP9 I shot for this review.
Comfort and Controllability
The TP9 comes out of the box with the small backstrap installed, making it very comfortable and easy to shoot for people with smaller hands. The grip angle is more vertical than you find on a Glock, more akin to that of a Walther or H&K pistol. The grip contour is nice, but like pretty much every other polymer gun, the grip texture is only serviceable for dry hands.
I found the TP9 SA to be a relatively soft shooter, but despite the low bore axis it does have a bit more muzzle flip than I find on most comparable pistols. The slide and frame are quite narrow and the frame is no wider than the slide, and straight sided, so I did not enjoy the absence of a support-hand forward “thumb rest” protrusion on the frame since I use my forward thumb to help manage recoil and muzzle rise while firing.
Components and Features
The trigger on the TP9 is fantastic. It’s lighter than I’ve found on any other striker-fired pistol, at around 4.5 pounds. The action of the trigger is completely grit free and while there is quite a bit of initial takeup, the break is crisp and the reset short. I’d take this trigger on any of my pistols. The rest of the controls seem well placed and I had no trouble running the gun.
The slide machining is seemingly of excellent quality, but I note that the desert tan finish on the gun I shot was more like paint than Cerakote. Pretty sure it is some kind of Duracoat finish. The 3-dot sights are nothing to write home about. I had no trouble picking them up, but they’re perhaps not best for all-purpose use. I tried, but was unable to find any aftermarket sights available.
The big point of contention among the features is the decocker on top of the slide. This feature seems to be a vestige of the original TP9. Whereas a decocker makes sense for a DA/SA gun, it makes no sense whatsoever on a single-action gun. The only positive function of the decocker here is for fieldstripping. You can press the decocker and then remove the slide without having to press the trigger first. Beyond that, any engagement of the decocker simply renders the trigger dead, so an accidental engagement means your pistol is not ready to fight and you have to work the slide in order to get the gun back in working order.
As far as I’m concerned, this flaw makes the Canik TP9 SA a no-go as a defensive weapon and relegates the pistol to plinking and competition use. Nothing terrible there, as a sub $400, 19-round stock pistol that actually works is not a bad way to get into competitive shooting!
There is a 3-slot picatinny rail on the frame. The steel magazines are quite nice. They’re made by Mec-Gar, which is known for quality. While the grip does not seem overlong, the 18-round capacity is another nice feature.
Conclusions
Pros
The price is nice! The value is nicer! The customizable grip size and the good fit for small hands will be welcome features for many folks—women especially. The capacity is excellent and the trigger is just about the best I’ve ever seen. Did I mention the price?
Cons
The TP9 SA is a bit too big to be a good carry gun. The decocker is practically useless and pretty much disqualifies the pistol for defensive carry, anyway. The sights are not well suited to all-purpose use and the lack of aftermarket options is not awesome.
So for rating the TP9…
Ergonomics (****)
There’s nothing terribly excellent about the shape and comfort of this gun, but nothing terribly bad either.
Shootability (***)
I’m deducting a bit for the slight extra bit of muzzle flip and the lack of a frame contour for a forward thumb rest, but surely this won’t be an issue for everyone.
Accuracy (****)
I found it to be a darned accurate shooter, though it did shoot rather low for me (and everyone else at the range that shot this pistol). This one required a full-on twelve o’clock hold.
Concealability (**)
The TP9 is not well suited to concealed carry. This is a plinker and competition gun.
In Summary
The price is the thing most folks will first take notice of, but the value for that low price appears to be excellent. While I only put a few hundred rounds through it, I have read from people I trust where this pistol endured 1000-round challenges without a hiccup. So reliability would seem to be component to the value.
My opinion is that the Canik TP9 SA is a pretty darned good pistol and would be an excellent way for a new shooter on a budget to get into the hobby. It would also seem to be a great option for those with small hands to get a good pistol that fits.
* * *
You are quite correct saying the de-cocker is not needed but you do not have to rack the slide to bring it into battery. If you have a shell in the chamber and it is de-cocked I have learned with mine that you only need snap the slide back a quarter inch and the stryker is cocked and since the bullet only moves slightly it reseats for immediate use.
Thanks Carl. You are certainly right. However, my observations refer to the relevant context of pistol use, and that is use in a defensive situation. One will not carefully reset the striker in this manner when one’s life is in danger.
I know that sporting/target shooting is a popular context for using a pistol, but my reviews will only ever discuss a pistol’s function and features as a weapon. The only rare exceptions would be those pistols that are of insufficient caliber or are setup purely as a precision target gun.
An otherwise straight-up weapon like the TP9 should be setup to defend life and I find fault with features that invite rendering the weapon incapable of doing so at the instant required. But that’s my opinion and you or others may disagree. Cheers!
Andy , you make a big issue about the decocker on top of the slide near the rear sight being useless . Saying that has probably kept many potential buyers from missing out on a great gun buy for a year-and-a-half since your review was published . And I support Carl’s comments . Your descriptive language needs improving . For example , you state that when the gun is decocked it renders the gun “dead” . Wrong wording ! It simply renders the trigger dead . And so that round in the chamber is very Very safe from firing accidentally , but it remains ready there . Simply ease the slide back a mere 3/16 inch and the trigger becomes ‘live’ again .Then pull the trigger and the gun will fire . Just incorporate that into your actions when practicing with the gun .
IMHO , that method makes the gun MORE safe than any cocked-and-locked gun with an external manual safety . And certainly safer than any gun with a long DA trigger pull as being the only safe-from-firing protection .
Next thing . You mention that bumping the decocker could cause the gun not to fire . However , on my TP9-SA , that decocker takes such a strong concentrated vertical press to decock that the thumb almost starts hurting . Only a real determined effort is going to activate it . Besides , that decocker is located in quite an out-of-the-way place free from impacts .
And finally , you reckon that the decocker feature renders the gun unfit for carry defense . Then later in the review you point out that the gun is a bit long for that purpose anyway . It may or may not be too long from some people to carry , but not for all . I ‘d sooner carry a shorter gun myself .
Oh , and stop implying that any gun cheaper than the norm in American dollars is questionable as to features and reliability . The Canik TP9-SA is less costly than say a CZ , a SIG , or an HK , simply due to the weakness of the Turkish currency versus the U.S. dollar . Too many of you gun reviewers don’t seem to understand that point . For half the U.S. dollar price , the Canik quality could potentially be better than for those just listed above .
Let us not mince words, if you present your firearm in a defensive situation and press the trigger expecting something useful to happen then the firearm is essentially dead. Of course, as with any other firearm, there are things that you can do to remedy the situation. All of those things are meant to deal with a malfunction. One doesn’t expect your first attempt to discharge a firearm to result in a malfunction and failure to fire. A counter point though is that one normally carries SA striker fired firearms in a holster that covers the trigger and presumably the decocker. The decocker doesn’t seem to be a deal breaker.
I understand why some might have reservations about the decocker, but i personally like it for my use. I’m currently using the TP9sa as my duty gun(private security), and at my job we open carry primarily just for show or putting down wounded animals. Obviously it’s also for defense, but from knowledge, no one at my job has every had to use their weapon against another person in over 20+ year history, so the likelihood having to use it as such is exceedingly low. As others have stated it only takes about 1/2 inch of slide travel to reset the striker and can easily be accomplished one-handed and while the weapon is holstered. I generally carry with a round in the chamber and decocked, and whenever i’m going into a situation with a higher potential of their being a violent altercation, such as doing a traffic stop or responding to fights/domestic disputes, etc, i can quickly and easily reset the striker with my strong hand and do so while drawing very little attention to myself, and whenever the situation has concluded it just takes a push of the decocker button to make the weapon safe again. In my opinion, the ability to go from dead trigger -> ready to go -> dead trigger easily and without having to even unholster the weapon is the TP9sa’s biggest advantage for my use-case, and the only thing that could make it any better was if it were hammer-fired and SAO with a decocker so that it was even easier to make the weapon fire-ready again.